Corporate Media vs. Personal Media - Part II

+ Posted by Josh Hallett on 06.01.06 // 10:46 AM

Some further thoughts on the relationship/battle between corporate media and personal media. The playing field is not level so it is difficult to accurately compare the two forms. Corporate media has research, staff, resources, etc, while a blogger may only have themselves, their readers and their passion for a subject. Each side attempts to hold the other to their own set of standards, which just doesn't work.

More and more media outlets are creating blogs. But going back to my post on blog misconceptions, are they adopting the tool or the style? Many are adopting the tool, i.e. the quick publishing of content with the ability to receive feedback from readers. But is the news still a lecture? Sure they have a blog, but if they're not linking, commenting and interacting with the readers then its not a conversation, it's a lecture.

The big question of course is will they be successful? Remember that in many cases their measure of success is revenue and page views. So we ask again, will they be successful? Looking at individual blogs there is a good chance they they might not. A blog does offer a beat reporter the ability to connect directly with those interested in their topic, but in many cases we're not talking about thousands of readers.

Taken in whole though, a blog network comprised of niche subjects and broader news and opinion based blogs can have a significant readership. This mirrors what is always been the case with the traditional newspaper, i.e. niche subject areas and the reporters that cover them are in a sense subsidized by the more popular content. That has always been the mission (or burden) of newspapers. If they just printed the popular news we'd have tabloids everywhere.

The newspapers that are learning (and doing it right) realize like many of us that blogs are a low cost way to publish. Suddenly content that could never find room in the print edition can be published online. At the Orlando Sentinel one of the popular blogs is Attention Must Be Paid by Elizabeth Maupin. Elizabeth blogs about theater in Central Florida and around the country. With her blog she has unlimited ink and paper to review and discuss the theatrical arts. But perhaps more importantly, Elizabeth can interact with readers that share her passion and interest. Is it a successful blog? In a passion/interaction sense it is, from a page view/revenue sense we'll have to wait and see.

In the next installment I will talk some more about the downfalls. What happens when they aren't successful? Will we see the traditional media say, 'Blogs don't work?' Those within the industry that never jumped on the blog bandwagon will say, 'told you so' while traditional bloggers will say, 'they weren't doing it right'. In my mind they'll both be right.

Visitor Comments

I think that Josh brings up really good point. How successful are blogs going to be?? Are they going to replace the newspaper someday? Are enough people willing to put the time and effort into blogging that it will take over all printed forms of media? It is really hard to form a hypothesis for these questions because blogging is such a new phenomenon.

I think that people are still very intimidated by blogging because it is such a public thing. Virtually anyone can log on line and view the things that you have written. This is very frightening to some people and I think it is going to be the main deterrent for keeping everyone from blogging. I also think that many people find blogging to be very time consuming and in a day and age where people barely have time to grocery shop-creating our own websites and continually posting stories, events, and opinions on a website that you have personally created will be hard to do.

I truly am fascinated by the blogging revolution and the idea that people can keep on line journals and opinion pages but I don't think they're going to someday eliminate printed news sources such as the newspaper.

Josh made a good point that people really enjoy reading about their niche area of interest. People generally have small, narrow areas of focus and that is why newspapers are broken up into sections. I think someday that the actual, printed form of the newspaper will become extinct but I do believe there will be a way to get that same source of information online. I also think that newspapers will be able to cater that information to their reader more specifically because of technology. Someday readers will be able to request what sections of the newspaper they would like to receive via email and what types of news events they are interested in reading about and the news sources will be able to email those articles and sections directly to them.

Blogging is going to have a huge effect on the way opinions are shared but I don't think that news articles and sources such as that will become extinct. Blogging is definitely the wave of the future and it should be embraced for social media purposes but not for news media purposes.

Post Your Comment






Blog Search
About Josh Hallett
Recent Blog Posts
More Golden Gate at Night
posted on: Aug 4, 2008 at 04:37 PM

Vote for Voce
posted on: Aug 4, 2008 at 04:31 PM

Clarity
posted on: Jul 21, 2008 at 06:03 PM

BlogHer 08 Photo Highlights
posted on: Jul 20, 2008 at 03:00 PM

Golden Gate Bridge at Night
posted on: Jul 20, 2008 at 12:03 PM

Nikon Coolpix S600 Initial Review
posted on: Jul 14, 2008 at 10:01 PM

Off to California and BlogHer Next Week
posted on: Jul 11, 2008 at 08:01 AM

BlogOrlando 2008 Registration
posted on: Jul 10, 2008 at 10:48 AM

Syndicate
Subscribe via E-mail
Where I Work

Blogs I Read
Photos
www.flickr.com
Location